<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matchless Hotbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diy-fever.com/amps/tube-reactor-pre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diy-fever.com</link>
	<description>Making my own guitar rig, one gadget at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bancika</title>
		<link>http://diy-fever.com/amps/tube-reactor-pre/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Bancika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diy-fever.com/wordpress/?page_id=168#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Thanks!

Yes, you can plug it straight into the power amp as it has high output voltage swing.
I never tried to separate the outputs, but it should work. The first stage will be loaded more with both outputs plugged, but don&#039;t know whether it will make it sound different or not. It&#039;s worth trying if you need two outputs...in case it sounds different in a bad way, maybe a solid state buffer (IRF820 or something) at the end of clean channel would help.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Yes, you can plug it straight into the power amp as it has high output voltage swing.<br />
I never tried to separate the outputs, but it should work. The first stage will be loaded more with both outputs plugged, but don&#8217;t know whether it will make it sound different or not. It&#8217;s worth trying if you need two outputs&#8230;in case it sounds different in a bad way, maybe a solid state buffer (IRF820 or something) at the end of clean channel would help.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Salinger</title>
		<link>http://diy-fever.com/amps/tube-reactor-pre/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Salinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 16:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diy-fever.com/wordpress/?page_id=168#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Nice work. 

Using the Marshall Tonestack was brilliant.

Can your &quot;Tube Reactor Pre Amp&quot; be plugged directly into a power amp? Or, does it work better in front of a standard guitar amp?

Secondly, is it possible forego the channel-swithing and keep both &#039;channels&#039; on at the same time? ...like a multi-amp set-up or a &quot;Voodoo Labs Sparkle Drive&quot;?

Keep up the good work.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work. </p>
<p>Using the Marshall Tonestack was brilliant.</p>
<p>Can your &#8220;Tube Reactor Pre Amp&#8221; be plugged directly into a power amp? Or, does it work better in front of a standard guitar amp?</p>
<p>Secondly, is it possible forego the channel-swithing and keep both &#8216;channels&#8217; on at the same time? &#8230;like a multi-amp set-up or a &#8220;Voodoo Labs Sparkle Drive&#8221;?</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
